Any physics textbook will tell you energy is “the capacity to do work”. Then it usually goes on to explain that “work” is the action of moving something against a force. But isn’t this definition kind of unsatisfying? It’s a bit like Plato’s definition of man as a “featherless biped” – it’s hard to poke holes in the reasoning, but you can’t help but feel something is missing.
The reason it is so hard to define is because it’s an abstract notion. In physics, the concept of “energy” is really just a kind of shorthand, a tool to help balance the books. It is always conserved (or converted into mass) so is incredibly useful in working out the results of any kind of physical or chemical process.
There is no physical “essence” of energy, and no such thing as “pure energy”. It is always carried by something, usually in the form of movement.
The classic example of kinetic energy is a billiard ball rolling across a table. The heavier the ball, the faster it moves, the more energy it carries. In other words, the more painful it will be if it pops off the table and lands on your little toe.
Another form of kinetic energy is known as heat. The temperature of something is a direct measurement of how fast the atoms inside it are moving. In a hot cup of coffee, the water molecules are racing around at a fast clip, slowing down as the cup cools.
Throw an iron bar into the fire and its atoms start moving faster too, although in this case the atoms are bound in position, and so the movement is the form of a jiggling vibration.
Sometimes an object is pulled or pushed in a particular direction, but its movement is stopped by some other force. In this case, the object is said to have potential energy – the potential to move.
It’s a bit like a racing car driver pressing the accelerator with the handbrake still on – nothing much happens until she releases the brake.
A glass sitting on a table is being pulled down by the force of gravity. But any movement is being stopped by a much stronger force – the electrical repulsion of the atoms in the table. Give the glass a nudge off the table, though, and it falls.
What about chemical, electrical, or nuclear energy? These are a bit more complicated, but in the final analysis, all these forms of energy also involve a type of movement or a potential to move.
For example, lots of energy is locked, like a coiled spring, inside atomic nuclei. This can be released when a uranium nucleus splits in two. The two halves are both positively charged, and so just after the split they are electrically repelled by another and fly apart. Thus the nuclear potential energy ends up as kinetic energy.
As the Russian physicist Lev Okun said, “The more basic is a physical notion, the more difficult to define it in words.” For energy, the best we can do is say it’s the capacity to cause movement.
And that should do us poor featherless bipeds just fine.
Related reading: Fusion energy inches toward ignition
Cathal O'Connell is a science writer based in Melbourne.
Read science facts, not fiction...
There’s never been a more important time to explain the facts, cherish evidence-based knowledge and to showcase the latest scientific, technological and engineering breakthroughs. Cosmos is published by The Royal Institution of Australia, a charity dedicated to connecting people with the world of science. Financial contributions, however big or small, help us provide access to trusted science information at a time when the world needs it most. Please support us by making a donation or purchasing a subscription today.