Australian science review – submission by Academy of Technology and Engineering



The Australian Academy of Technology and Engineering was founded in 1975 as one of Australia’s four learned Academies.

At the inauguration in 1976, the Academy inducted its first Honorary Fellow, Sir Mark Oliphant – the Governor of South Australia and a Foundation Fellow.

ATSE’s submission to the Review of the ARC argues that the ARC should be strengthened, supported, and legislated to be a national leader in research grant funding.


The ARC should be reformed to: 

1. Develop and model best practices in research funding, including a two-stage approach to research funding applications, and propagate to other government funding programs 

2. Ensure optimal value of public research funding by coordinating funding and research outputs across government funding programs, including to remove date and assessment conflicts and ensure alignment where possible and desirable 

3. Strengthen Australian research by increasing research funding and provide full funding for indirect costs of research for all fields of research, not constrained by the National Science and Research Priorities 

4. Champion research funding across the research pipeline, including curiosity-driven, null result and replication research 

5. Promote public and sectoral trust in the research funding system by removing (or constraining and requiring full transparency for) the ministerial veto 

6. Provide certainty to researchers, industry, and universities by adhering to legislated dates for grant outcome announcements 

7. Embed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research and researchers in the ARC through an uplift in representation and cultural competency 

8. Engage with research outcomes including through the implementation of a grant renewal system for research yielding promising results 

9. Highlight the impact and excellence of publicly funded research by rethinking the use of the National Interest Test (NIT) and the Excellence in Research Australia to create a single reporting mechanism 

Atse submission image

10. Enhance administrative resourcing to support the ARC in its expanded role in national research funding coordination and best practice approaches 

11. Consider further avenues to reduce wastage in the grant application and assessment process, such as limiting the number of ARC applications from each university, while implementing measures to support gender equity in funding outcomes 

12. Require its assessors to confirm that they have not been censured under a formal bullying or harassment investigation process 

Read the full submission

Cosmos will publish a selection of responses to these occasional posts. Please email your thoughts direct to [email protected].

Other submissions to the ARC review published by Cosmos

Academy of Health and Medical Sciences

University of Melbourne

Group of 8 Universities

Australian Academy of Science

Professor John Long

Please login to favourite this article.