Australian Science Review – Academy of Science submission



In September 2022 the Australian Government announced plans to refresh Australia’s Science and Research Priorities and National Science Statement.

The ARC Review Panel will provide the Minister for Education with an Interim Report by
31 December 2022 and a Final Report by 31 March 2023. 

The Australian Academy of Science made this public statement on December 23, 2022.

The Australian Academy of Science says the lack of coherence in Australian support for research is debilitating and an indictment of the approaches that imply that knowledge is only important if it can be commercialised

The Academy also says that the current state of Australian research lacks strategic direction and is a result of a piecemeal interference and ad hoc interventions over two decades that have demoralised researchers, minimised efficiency and disadvantaged the nation.

The comments were made in the Academy’s submission on the review of the Australian Research Council Act published today.

The submission also says fundamental research should be the primary focus of the ARC.

The submission states: It is of the utmost importance to the national research system and our national prosperity that the role of the ARC in supporting fundamental research be restored and safeguarded.  

The Academy notes while the review of the Australian Research Council Act does not have the scope to consider wider system issues, no review, or recommendations to do with the Australian Research Council (ARC) can occur in a vacuum. 

The submission states: Changes to the role, responsibilities, focus, settings, governance, or legislation of the ARC will invariably influence the operation of the broader research system – without addressing the central problem:  212 research funding programs across 12 Commonwealth Departments. 

The submission calls on the Australian Government to commission an independent science and research system review without delay. 

It also recommends:

  • the establishment of an ARC Council or Board in the Act, with a legislated requirement to have members with diverse research expertise 
  • the objects of the Act are revised to represent the aspirations and purpose of the ARC, including the responsibility the ARC has on behalf of the Australian people to support fundamental research  
  • the focus of the Linkage program on collaborations between researchers be restored, and programs on industry engagement and commercialisation be run by a different agency   
  • that Excellence in Research Australia (ERA) be discontinued and that the ARC modernises its capacity and requirements for data collection and analysis 
  • that the efficiency and fairness of the application processes be improved
  • the role of the ARC as an adviser to the Government on research policy be strengthened in the Act
  • that limits be placed on the use of ministerial discretion to disapprove properly assessed research proposals. 

The submission says it is instructive that research councils in overseas jurisdictions have different governance structures from that of the ARC. 

Read the Academy’s submission and the full list of recommendations.

Cosmos will publish a selection of responses to these occasional posts. Please email your thoughts direct to [email protected].

Subscribe to ultramarine from riaus

Do you care about the oceans? Are you interested in scientific developments that affect them? Then our new email newsletter Ultramarine, launching soon, is for you. Click here to become an inaugural subscriber.

Please login to favourite this article.