Having a tiny brain is an advantage in life. At least if you’re a woodpecker.
While impolite humans throw around the word “birdbrain” as an insult, it seems that in the case of woodpeckers, it’s an evolutionary advantage.
“They do not absorb the shock of the impact with the tree. Their heads basically function as stiff, solid hammers during pecking,” says the study’s lead author Sam Van Wassenbergh from the University of Antwerp, Belgium.
That, the research says, makes sense. If the skull had shock-absorbing properties, it would dissipate the head’s kinetic energy. And that would mean our poor woodpecker had to work much longer to drill into a tree trunk.
Instead, the forces exerted on the brain by this repeated motion and impact are insufficient to cause damage.
That’s good news for these birds which have an incredibly high, repetitive pecking output, as anyone who’s heard the clamour can attest.
How they worked it out
Van Wassenbergh’s team performed their analysis by calculating the impact decelerations from black (Dryocopus martius), pileated (D. pileatus) and great spotted (Dendrocopos major) woodpeckers and applying the data to build biomechanical models.
From this, they were able to debunk the idea that shock-absorption was a factor in play.
“I have witnessed parents explaining to their kids that woodpeckers don’t get headaches because they have shock absorbers built into their head,” Van Wassenbergh says.
“This myth of shock absorption in woodpeckers is now busted by our findings, and the absence of shock absorption does not mean their brains are in danger during the seemingly violent impacts.
“Even the strongest shocks from the over 100 pecks that were analysed should still be safe for the woodpeckers’ brains, as our calculations showed brain loadings that are lower than that of humans suffering a concussion.”
Woodpecker research ongoing
Van Wassenbergh’s team has been studying the properties that allow woodpeckers to efficiently chip away at tree trunks for several years, including recently publishing detail on how the birds avoid getting stuck in trunks.
This is possible despite their hammer-and-nail approach to wood penetration thanks to their ability to move their upper and lower beaks independently.
They’re no slouches either – this process of “walking” their chisel-like beaks out from tree wood takes place within 70 milliseconds.
The Antwerp team is now investigating how their beaks’ shapes are optimised for woodpecking.
Interested in having science explained? Listen to our new podcast.
Matthew Agius is a science writer for Cosmos Magazine.
Read science facts, not fiction...
There’s never been a more important time to explain the facts, cherish evidence-based knowledge and to showcase the latest scientific, technological and engineering breakthroughs. Cosmos is published by The Royal Institution of Australia, a charity dedicated to connecting people with the world of science. Financial contributions, however big or small, help us provide access to trusted science information at a time when the world needs it most. Please support us by making a donation or purchasing a subscription today.